<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Bollywood Observer &#187; sajid khan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebollywoodobserver.com/tag/sajid-khan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebollywoodobserver.com</link>
	<description>Tracking Bollywood’s emergence into a new era.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bollywood: Please Ignore Sajid Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.thebollywoodobserver.com/2010/05/03/housefull-hoping-houses-arent-full/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebollywoodobserver.com/2010/05/03/housefull-hoping-houses-arent-full/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swati</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munnabhai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housefull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sajid khan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebollywoodobserver.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t help but dwell on the double meaning in the tile of Sajid Khan&#8217;s new film Housefull. The film is about a man who marries three women, hence the title. But the title hints at Director Sajid Khan&#8217;s real mission to make the film: to attract large audiences, reap the profits from a huge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but dwell on the double meaning in the tile of Sajid Khan&#8217;s new film <em>Housefull</em>. The film is about a man who marries three women, hence the title. But the title hints at Director Sajid Khan&#8217;s real mission to make the film: to attract large audiences, reap the profits from a huge box office hit, and, to have sold out theaters with a &#8220;full house.&#8221;</p>
<p>Khan has been repeatedly saying that this film is made for entertainment purposes only, and is made to appeal to the masses. He says it will be a masala flick, and has in the past hated on critics for giving him bad ratings. His last film, <em>Heyy Babyy</em>, &#8220;borrowed&#8221;a plethora of material from Hollywood and Bollywood films, lacked an original script, and was ripe with overacting and brainless jokes.  According to this review of <a href="http://www.naachgaana.com/2010/04/30/house-with-no-room-for-laughs-sandys-review-of-housefull/">Housefull</a>, it seems like this film is more of the same.</p>
<p>In an interview with <em>India Express</em>, Khan said:</p>
<blockquote><p><span>I know that there are 10 per cent  pseudo intellectual people who like slow, boring, insignificant and  non-entertaining films. But then for me, cinema is only about  entertainment. It could be in any form, whether action, comedy, thriller  or drama,&#8221; Sajid said. </span></p>
<p><span>Expressing his  desire to make only entertainers, Sajid, &#8220;Nobody comes to watch a film  to change their life. Has a film ever cured cancer, split an atom or  changed society? Not at all. The sooner most directors realise it, the  better it would be for Bollywood as it would stop delivering any flops.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Filmmakers have proven that art and comedy can be mixed, that intelligent films can deliver box office gold. Take<em> Jaane Tu Yah Jaane Na</em> or the<em> Munnabhai </em>films. They were commercial, mainstream, but were original,  inspiring and hilarious. Entertainment doesn&#8217;t mean that there&#8217;s no room for some depth.</p>
<p>A few years ago, the Sajid Khan- style brainless masalas were all the rage in India. The audiences loved them, and the producers loved the profit. Khan&#8217;s words may have held a lot of weight in the 90&#8217;s and early 00&#8217;s, but today, his words aren&#8217;t applicable to Bollywood. Art films are doing well, and filmmakers have begun to make smart entertainers. At some point, audiences started rejecting these cliched scripts and overacting, and began to appreciate films that were smarter, more original, and all around better films.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that films like <em>Dev D</em>. or <em>Omkara</em>, though both successes, are the only examples of what constitutes as a smart yet successful film. Uber-masala flicks like <em>Wake Up Sid</em> and <em>Jab We Met</em> are all great  and original films that achieved box office success.</p>
<p>Khan&#8217;s may say his main goal is to attract audiences and to make money, but his rejection of films as art work is problematic. Alas, he was successful with his debut film, and it seems like he will be with this movie as well. That&#8217;s fine, and that&#8217;s his right. My only hope is that Bollywood filmmakers and producers don&#8217;t budge from their current progress and don&#8217;t forget that intellect and entertainment aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebollywoodobserver.com/2010/05/03/housefull-hoping-houses-arent-full/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

